기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Victory Lap, By George Saunders (2007)

Victory Lap, By George Saunders (2007)

Rating: 8.5/10


I really enjoyed trying to understand the whole story. I do admit that this unusual flow of the plot can act as an obstacle for readers to delve into, but for me, it acted as an attractive device. It was interesting to see how a "short story" can make no sense at first sight, even though it's not twisted into pages and long chapters. I notice that the benefit of setting the story focused on the narrator's flow of mind is that whenever the narrator's sight moves on from one character to another, the reader gets to focus as well as the narrator. It was refreshing to learn about each character through the eyes of the narrator. And even though the readers can expect that the girl is about to face the danger of being raped, the narrator's nescient or pure attitude allows us to really identify with the narrator. I would've rated it over 9 if it was amusing as well as refreshing, but personally, I only felt that the style is new, but not interesting, so I rated <Victory Lap> as 8.8.

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

The Swimmer, By John Cheever (1964)

The Swimmer, By John Cheever (1964) Rating: 9.3/10 I personally think these kinds of stories are what short stories should be like. Very easy to understand, direct, and clear, but also a very unusual way of unfolding the plot compared to other stories. The main character was similar to Blake from The Five-Forty-Eight, they both represent American white men during the era. The devices like alcohol, pool, and season were implemented in a very enjoyable way so that readers can follow them like a clue and reach the conclusion. What I notice from recent stories we've read is that we don't whether the main character changes or not, it's always an open ending, however, we see their environment changing as a consequence of their prior actions. Overall very amusing and I wished I had the ability to write stories like this that can closely touch the readers.

James Joyce vs Anton Chekhov

James Joyce vs Anton Chekhov First, I would like to define the characteristics of each author, starting with James Joyce. Based on Joyce's stories I've read so far, I felt that his stories are very concise and efficient. And he also manages well to use the advantage of writing a short story and maximize it. Instead, Chekhov focuses on the change of the character's mindset which is also emphasized by the same daily routine that is described differently from each perspective, before the change, during the change, and after the change. Both authors end the story with an open conclusion, but I found Chekhov's conclusion more intriguing to read. In the story <The Lady with the Dog>, Chekhov doesn't imply any ethical messages or moral lessons in his conclusion. For example, writers like Tolstoy would end the conclusion of wrongdoers with punishment, but in this story, Gurov and Anna don't pay anything for committing adultery, leaving the readers to decide. Overa...

The Lady with the Dog, By Anton Chekhov (1899)

The Lady with the Dog, By Anton Chekhov (1899) Rating: 6.5/10 I didn't really enjoy this story as much as other short stories. The reason why is because, throughout the whole story, there were unnecessary rhetorical devices that were repetitive. For example, the author describes the place 'Yalta' not only at the opening but kept mentioning it whenever Gurov and Anna would take a walk. For me, this style of writing distanced me, the reader from the flow of the theme that this story is trying to deliver. It did enhance the reader's understanding of each individual character's change of thoughts, but interpreting the theme, wasn't efficient. At least the story ended with a totally open conclusion, but I would've enjoyed it much better if the story gave more space to the readers also during the process of reaching the conclusion.