기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

Eveline, By James Joyce (1904)

Eveline, By James Joyce (1904)

Rating: 8/10
The feeling that I have towards dystopian literature is that it always carries a gloomy and depressing atmosphere. So as I experienced these typical atmospheres when I read Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, I thought that this story would also carry the mood as well. However, The Sound of Thunder had a very impactful and concise flow of the story. First of all, the concept that expands the reader’s imagination to the past and future intrigued me the most. Also, other special features that the author uses make the flow of the story very intense. For example, the butterfly effect and the fact that Eckels is not the typical hero that we usually imagine. The story doesn’t show fancy and colorful events, but I think that the elements that I’ve mentioned fill up the background, eventually creating a concise, well-written short story. Overall, this is my favorite dystopian story from what I have read so far. (155 words)

댓글

댓글 쓰기

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

The Swimmer, By John Cheever (1964)

The Swimmer, By John Cheever (1964) Rating: 9.3/10 I personally think these kinds of stories are what short stories should be like. Very easy to understand, direct, and clear, but also a very unusual way of unfolding the plot compared to other stories. The main character was similar to Blake from The Five-Forty-Eight, they both represent American white men during the era. The devices like alcohol, pool, and season were implemented in a very enjoyable way so that readers can follow them like a clue and reach the conclusion. What I notice from recent stories we've read is that we don't whether the main character changes or not, it's always an open ending, however, we see their environment changing as a consequence of their prior actions. Overall very amusing and I wished I had the ability to write stories like this that can closely touch the readers.
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기

James Joyce vs Anton Chekhov

James Joyce vs Anton Chekhov First, I would like to define the characteristics of each author, starting with James Joyce. Based on Joyce's stories I've read so far, I felt that his stories are very concise and efficient. And he also manages well to use the advantage of writing a short story and maximize it. Instead, Chekhov focuses on the change of the character's mindset which is also emphasized by the same daily routine that is described differently from each perspective, before the change, during the change, and after the change. Both authors end the story with an open conclusion, but I found Chekhov's conclusion more intriguing to read. In the story <The Lady with the Dog>, Chekhov doesn't imply any ethical messages or moral lessons in his conclusion. For example, writers like Tolstoy would end the conclusion of wrongdoers with punishment, but in this story, Gurov and Anna don't pay anything for committing adultery, leaving the readers to decide. Overa...
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기

The Lady with the Dog, By Anton Chekhov (1899)

The Lady with the Dog, By Anton Chekhov (1899) Rating: 6.5/10 I didn't really enjoy this story as much as other short stories. The reason why is because, throughout the whole story, there were unnecessary rhetorical devices that were repetitive. For example, the author describes the place 'Yalta' not only at the opening but kept mentioning it whenever Gurov and Anna would take a walk. For me, this style of writing distanced me, the reader from the flow of the theme that this story is trying to deliver. It did enhance the reader's understanding of each individual character's change of thoughts, but interpreting the theme, wasn't efficient. At least the story ended with a totally open conclusion, but I would've enjoyed it much better if the story gave more space to the readers also during the process of reaching the conclusion.
댓글 쓰기
자세한 내용 보기